Laserfiche WebLink
SEP 1 <br />BOOK 69•: `?Aft 234 <br />1987 <br />WABASSO BEACH <br />(Supplement to C.A.R.L.'Proposal) <br />Wabasso Beach represents one of the longest stretches of relatively undeveloped, <br />privately owned beachfront property remaining in Florida. Unquestionably, it is one <br />or'the longest such stretches on the Atlantic coast, and statewide may be rivaled <br />only by the Topsail Hill tract on the Gulf Coast. The primary goal of this proposal <br />to protect Wabasso Beach is to assure the continued viability of one of the most <br />important sea turtle nesting populations in the world (see below). Secondarily, the <br />remainder of the tract would protect a large area of coastal strand and maritime <br />hammock habitats and their associated biota, all of which are threatened by the <br />enormous development of Florida's Atlantic coast. Preservation of the site would.• <br />additionallyp'rovide a protective buffer to the marine worm reefs just offshore. <br />Principally through the Save Our Coasts (S.O.C.) program, the state and county <br />governments already own or are pursuing the acquisition of a substantial amount of <br />land (approximately 3/4 mile) within the overall boundaries of this proposal. These ; <br />lands would benefit greatly by the ecological buffer that would be provided by the <br />addition of the remaining undeveloped contiguous lands along this stretch of beach. <br />Commissioner Bird wished to make the point that Indian River <br />Shores has six miles of beach which is all private property, and <br />he believed the turtles may have a better chance of being <br />unmolested there than at public beaches. We are getting the best <br />of both worlds - we have all these great turtle nesting beaches, <br />and we also have some millions of dollars worth of property value <br />on the tax rolls to help carry the freight. In addition, we have <br />a turtle protection ordinance. <br />Chairman Scurlock's only question was that we requested <br />state funds, and you have to set priorities. He just did not <br />want this to affect the priority of something that we may <br />possibly want more than that. <br />Commissioner Wheeler noted that if anyone buys and develops <br />that beachfront property, we will only have further problems with <br />erosion, and if he had to choose, he would choose this over the <br />sand ridge project. <br />Commissioner Bowman did not agree. <br />Commissioner Bird stated that he did not have any problem <br />supporting this request, but just wanted to bring out his point <br />about the private property. <br />Commissioner Bowman was against it, and felt we were saying <br />if the beachfront were privately owned, the turtles would have a <br />better chance. <br />48 <br />