Laserfiche WebLink
►QCT 6 1987RoaK 69 FacF 62$ <br />Commissioner Eggert assumed that in conjunction with the <br />request for proposals, we will determine whether we need to <br />correct just the source of the noise or whether we need to go to <br />all 24 areas, and the Administrator felt the D.O.C. should tell <br />us what is necessary. <br />THE VICE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously (4-0) <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JAIL, PHASE II <br />Owners Representative "Sonny" Dean reviewed the following <br />memo and letter from Frizzell Architects: <br />TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: SEPTEMBER 17, 1987 <br />THRU: CHARLES P. BALCZUN <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRZN <br />FROM: H. T. "SONNY" DE <br />OWNERS AUTHORIZESENTATIVE <br />SUBJECT: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JAIL - PHASE II <br />BACKGROUND <br />Attached letter summary is the situation of the subject project to <br />date. The contractor has not completed the job and it appears we <br />will not be ready for occupancy until sometime in November. <br />The primary cause of this extended delay is the detention <br />electronics. This has been the cause of late completion dates in <br />past experience with jail projects. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Due to the fact that electronics are a very specialized item and <br />are customized to accommodate each individual project, staff <br />recommends that Alternative Three be selected and allow Schopke i <br />Construction to finish the project with continued liquidated <br />damages. <br />The Architect, W. R. Frizzell, and this writer have denied further <br />monetary draw on the contracted price until substantial completion. <br />50 <br />w <br />w <br />