Laserfiche WebLink
OCT 2 o 1997 BOOK 69 PA .)F.756 <br />IRC JAIL, PHASE II, FLOOR DRAINS AND FLOOR TILES <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/13/87: <br />TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />THRU: CHARLES P. BALCZUN <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />FROM: H. T. DE <br />OWNER'S AUTHO ZED REPRESENTATIVE <br />SUBJECT: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JAIL - PHASE II <br />FLOOR DRAINS AND FLOOR TILES <br />DATE: OCTOBER 13, 1987 <br />M <br />Bill Baird, former Jail Administrator, made a routine inspection of the <br />subject facility and found three areas of major concern. W. -R. <br />Frizzell, Architect for the project was put on notice after inspection <br />and confirmation by this writer. <br />Mr. Dalas Disney, the architect's project manager for the jail project, -- <br />investigated our concerns and provided plans to eliminate the problem. <br />Mr. Disney was informed that I felt this problem should have been _ <br />addressed during design and the County should only be responsible for <br />labor and material to make the corrections. <br />Since the General Contractor is presently under liquidated damages and <br />would require additional time, overhead, and cost for his sub- <br />contractor to perform this work, I recommended the work be contracted <br />directly with sub -contractors qualified to make these corrections. <br />W. R. Frizzell has followed this recommendation and acquired pricing <br />directly with the sub -contractor who performed the original work in the <br />specified areas. <br />The total cost of this work.'is $8,860.90. The County will pay <br />$7,635.90 and W. R. Frizzell will pay $1,225.00 plus all cost of <br />design. <br />Since jails are notorious for flooding by inmates and recognizing the <br />damage that could be caused to the flooring, Staff recommends Board <br />approval and authorization to have the work performed. <br />Administrator Balczun noted that Sonny Dean, who is the <br />authorized representative on this project, is not here this <br />morning. However, Mr. Dean and staff have discussed this matter <br />extensively and feel that there is no other alternative than to <br />have this work done. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt that since this work should have been <br />included in the original design, the architect should be <br />responsible for paying more than what is proposed. He believed <br />we have some leverage since this same architect will be doing the <br />third phase of the Jail. He pointed out that the architect was <br />paid'7o of construction costs of almost $4.2 million, and he felt <br />46 <br />r <br />