My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/17/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
11/17/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:21 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:54:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/17/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br />are on board, and asked Administrator Balczun how he would <br />describe the primary duties of the OMB Director under the present <br />process. <br />Administrator Balczun felt that it would be someone who <br />collates the various annual budgets that come in from <br />constitutional officers and those of the county departments. He <br />did not, however, envision him making policy decisions with <br />respect to the budget suggested to the Board by the <br />Administrator. Secondly, he would manage the budget in terms of <br />filling his traditional role as budget cop, which in a sense is <br />the internal audit function. Beyond that, since this county does <br />not have an encumbrance system, the OMB Director could prepare <br />all kinds of reports, analyses and statements for the Board's <br />review on capital projects, operations, etc. <br />Chairman Scurlock saw the OMB Director's position under the <br />the Board as listening to the direction when the Board passes the <br />budget. Basically, he is the budget cop, and if the budget has <br />to be changed or modified, to see that it comes through the <br />proper process, and look to Florida law to see that we are doing <br />the proper thing. From the financing aspect, to work with the <br />Finance Advisory Committee on individual capital projects, <br />including the Administrator, just like the County Attorney works <br />with the Administrator. <br />Commissioner Bird wanted to adopt the type of operating <br />system that is best for the county, and make the personnel fit <br />the system, not the other way around. He didn't want us to get <br />in the position where we are trying to modify the system to fit <br />the personality. <br />Commissioner Eggert felt the change would work very well, <br />because we should think of the County Commission as one person. <br />The Board is not going to be treating Director Baird any <br />differently than we do now. However, what will be eliminated are <br />certain staff pressures which we have seen in this building for at least <br />4 3BOOK ® P°: - 138 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.