Laserfiche WebLink
The Board reviewed the following letter dated 1/25, 1988:. <br />',HERMAN N SMITH. JR <br />IAI( HAEL. 0 HAIRE <br />JEROME D QUINN <br />IIARLES E GARRIS. <br />MICHAEL J GARAVAGLIA <br />DO -ORES D. DECAPRIO <br />. CERTIFIED IN TA%ATICN <br />Charles Vitunac, Esq. <br />County Attorney <br />Indian River County <br />1840 25th Street <br />Vero Beach, FL 32960 <br />gax q;a Q9F <br />UflNZtl & GARRHE�3 <br />January 25, 1988 <br />Re: Boulevard Shoppes/Vista Gardens <br />15674 <br />Dear Charlie: <br />Assoc., Inc.; <br />RICHARD B CANDLER <br />SEAN O'HAIRE <br />REPLY TO <br />Island <br />Our File No. <br />I note that, notwithstanding my letter to you of January 18th, there is <br />still on the agenda for the County Commission meeting tomorrow the matter of <br />a request from Vista Gardens Association for the Commission to considerer <br />amendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. In that regard, I would <br />suggest that consideration of the Association's application for amendment of <br />the land use designation for the property involved in the Boulevard Shoppes <br />site plan application (No. SP -MA -86-10-91) is improper for failure to be <br />accompanied by (1) the required fee, (2) a statement of authorization, <br />(3) statement of ownership, (4) certificate of title and (5) boundary survey. <br />I have applied for many CLUP changes over the past few years and have <br />never been excused from compliance with the rules. The Association, <br />although it represents a block of voters, is not exempt from the rules the <br />rest of us must follow. <br />Additionally, the Boulevard Shoppes project has been through three <br />Technical Review Committee meetings and will be reagendaed for the Planning <br />& Zoning Commission within the next couple of weeks. Absent adoption of a <br />moratorium by the Commission, which would surely be discriminatory and <br />illegal, nothing will stop the process in progress. My client has complied <br />with or satisfied every requirement of every department within the County, <br />deliberately made more onerous by the people who would now seek an <br />irregular change in the land use plan that my clients are entitled to, and <br />have, relied upon. <br />I am writing all of this because I feel that the County Attorney's office <br />is obliged to address legal matters, even if it does not agree with them, on <br />matters scheduled before the Commission. <br />Awaiting your advice, I remain <br />MOH/pkm <br />cc Leonard L. Farber, Inc. <br />` i d1'&"ties, Inc. <br />111 •'.I �'IC,t LP()',EACH, I.O1.4I1,44. <br />1 )5}'.67-434.1 <br />27 <br />f :71:L.1NI) 'D.104011 <br />'1111 3 A11UI t U•I VERO Lit ,1A'H. f 1.13'I3.A i, <br />'31-C'inu <br />P W9 2 Fn 1PFIR BOOK 70 [Au- 6S5 <br />