Laserfiche WebLink
Attorney Vitunac reported that Reynold Smith of the <br />Laundromat has said that they would settle for $75,000 now, and <br />probably for $75,000 in a year or two from now. He noted that <br />Mr. Niece of the supermarket is in the audience this morning and <br />perhaps could tell us what he is thinking, but Mr. Niece <br />indicated that he had no comment. <br />Planner Stan Boling went to the City to see what could be <br />built on that block if the supermarket and Laundromat were to <br />remain. Since the decision was made to go with the Grace <br />Lutheran site, it has been decided to go with a 35,000 sq. ft., <br />2 -story structure, and given as how the County would not have any <br />setbacks to the property line for parking areas, the amount of <br />area available for parking is the same. <br />Attorney Vitunac stated that at the end of the leases, the <br />supermarket and laundromat would be torn down and the supermarket <br />site would be incorporated into the library site. <br />Commissioner Wheeler understood that the offer today is <br />$325,000, and then we are looking at $75,000 to buy out the <br />Laundromat, which puts us up to $400,000 plus whatever legal or <br />other costs are required to buy out the leases for the <br />supermarket and the Laundromat. If we have to go to eminent <br />domain, we would have the cost of purchasing the land. We would <br />have all of that cost, and unless we wait until 1991 to build, we <br />would have to build around the existing building. He, for one, <br />was not interested in building around a supermarket <br />want to go any further with this site. <br />Commissioner Eggert felt we have two options: <br />and did not <br />(1) Find a <br />way to accommodate the leases, or (2) Reopen on a very short term <br />basis, the search <br />that the decision <br />structure, we can <br />for another site. She pointed out that now <br />has been made to go with a 35,000 sq. ft. <br />utilize a smaller site, perhaps 3 or 3.5 acres. <br />Three sites were rejected previously because they were felt to be <br />too small, but now they could be reconsidered along with some <br />others. <br />65 <br />,JAN 2 6 1988 <br />BGlOY 70 PAA 723 <br />