My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/2/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
2/2/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:33:44 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:04:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/02/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
recommendations and not the few residents who came in to complain <br />and did not own the majority of the property in the area. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard. <br />Attorney Michael O'Haire came before the Board representing <br />Mr. and Mrs. Sam Ferraguti, owners of Parcel 12, which is located <br />west of the railroad tracks. They are bordered on the north by <br />Mama Mia's restaurant and on the east across U.S., by the Polish <br />American Club. He stressed that this property is a narrow strip <br />between the railroad and U.S.!, and to think that property is <br />ever going to be usable as residential property is not reason- <br />able. Attorney O'Haire urged the Board to deny the rezoning, <br />which was voted down unanimously by the PAZ Commission, and leave <br />things as they are up there. <br />Commissioner Eggert believed we worked hard to try to see if <br />we could get the node to stretch down that far and that is why <br />there is the MXD. <br />Commissioner Bird emphasized that he certainly would have no <br />intention of changing any of parcels 10, 11, 12, or 1, 2, 3 and R <br />- the only question in his mind may be regarding the western <br />portions of parcels 5, 7 and 8. He felt the property right <br />along the railroad and U.S.! should be commercial. <br />Dir. Keating contended that if the idea is that everything <br />along U.S.I. and the railroad should not be residential, there <br />then was no reason to put MXD in the Comprehensive Plan, and we <br />will have strip development from county line to county line. He <br />noted that the reason this SAP was not that bad when it was done <br />was that the area was undeveloped. He did agree we should go <br />back and take another look, butdid not agree everything along <br />U.S.I. should be commercial. <br />Commissioner Bird believed there are some predominantly <br />commercial and light industrial uses in this area, and he felt <br />that is what fits best here. <br />Chairman Scurlock also noted that this is probably one of <br />the narrower pieces between the tracks and U.S.I. <br />25 <br />FEB 2 i9F <br />BOOK 70 FAC 754 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.