My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/2/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
2/2/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:33:44 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:04:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/02/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TEE 1988 <br />BOOK 7Q PAJE 753 <br />Precise Land Use Map (PLUM), what was looked at, and the possible <br />need to look at the WBSAP again. <br />Director Keating noted that when the plan was developed and <br />amended in 1985 and 1986, it was non -controversial, and he <br />believed the reason it was non -controversial is that staff was <br />working with the Winter Beach Progressive League which did not <br />include a lot of the absentee owners. <br />Commissioner Wheeler had no problem with the commercial, <br />industrial or multi -family use in the MXD along that corridor the <br />way it is now except that it is not what the SAP represents based <br />on the action we took last year in downzoning to RS -3. As he <br />understood it, what the planners are saying is that we need to go <br />back and readdress the Small Area Plan. <br />Chairman Scurlock again emphasized that good planning would <br />dictate that you transition from the light industrial type of <br />development that is going to occur near U.S.! and the railroad, <br />and you don't transition from Tight industrial by going immedi- <br />ately to the lowest density single family use. We had a bunch of <br />people who pushed on the Commission for the lowest density <br />without any transition, and now we are facing how we deal with <br />the railroad track and U.S.I. <br />Commissioner Eggert did not believe we are facing anything. <br />It is there; it works just fine the way it is; and she felt in <br />many cases low density and light industrial get along just fine. <br />Commissioner Wheeler also felt that good planning strictly <br />according to the textbook does not always go along with how the <br />people in the neighborhood want to live. He personally would <br />prefer to live next to commercial and Tight industrial rather <br />than some multi -family neighborhoods. <br />Chairman Scurlock noted that obviously he is not going to <br />win this argument because he didn't win it last time, but he <br />wished to make his comments for the record because he personally <br />felt we should have listened to the Planning Department's <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.