My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/16/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
2/16/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:32:17 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:06:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/16/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pr - <br />FEB i 066 <br />FACE 900 <br />TO: Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />RE: <br />(2Q29,t(b-42, <br />Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney <br />February 15, 1988 <br />USE OF OLD JAIL SITE FOR LIBRARY <br />Yot) have asked me to respond concerning what legal <br />requirement exists that the library bond issue be charged <br />some amount for use of the old jail site or new hea-Ith <br />department building site. <br />The library bond issue was passed to acquire two sites and <br />build two libraries.. The bonds will be paid by.ad valorem <br />taxes countywide. The bond issue does not requ,i,re that the <br />County spend any amount or percentage of money to acquire <br />land. It clearly authorizes acceptance of donated land. <br />The next question is whether the County may dedicate the old <br />jail site for library purposes for no or Kittle <br />remuneration. The old jail site was acquired years ago by <br />the County as an asset of the general fund. This is a <br />countywide fund supported by the taxpayers of the whole <br />county --the same people who pay for the library bonds. Thus, <br />the land could be dedicated for library purposes unless the <br />bond issue itself restricted the total expenses of the <br />library costs to the bond amount, i.e., $5.9 million. <br />The bond documents are only an authorization for long-term <br />capital funding through taxes. They do not either explicitly <br />or implicitly forbid the use of other money, lands, or <br />funds. Thus, in my opinion, there is no legal requirement <br />for the County to pay anything for the old jail site if the <br />Board of County Commissioners decides to use that land for <br />the new library. <br />The new health department site was acquired by another bond <br />issue supported by revenue which would otherwise be put into <br />• the general fund. The bond authorized raising money for <br />capital projects as follows: <br />"Project" shall mean the construction, <br />reconstruction, acquisition, alteration, <br />furnishing and equipping of buildings and capital <br />facilities of the County for administrative, law <br />enforcement, judicial, jail, medical use, <br />recreational facilities, excluding beach <br />renourishment, and other facilities to house <br />governmental services in the County, all pursuant <br />to the plans and specifications of a Qualified <br />Independent Consultant on file, or to be on file, <br />with the Issuer. <br />Thus, use of the new health department site for a library <br />would be proper without charging the library bond fund for <br />the bond if a new public library comes within the definition <br />of "Project", which I believe it does. <br />82 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.