Laserfiche WebLink
cmc <br />..161 <br />ASSN. <br />those people in the Chambers who were in opposition to the <br />closing of Jungle Trail or making it into a footpath to please <br />stand up and be counted. Approximately 75 people stood up. <br />Herndon Williams, 27 Forest Park Drive, spoke in favor of <br />the abandonment of that portion of Jungle Trail. He did not <br />believe that the people here this morning were a representative <br />group of the county as a whole, and did not feel that the Board <br />should consider that as a vote on whether or not vehicular <br />traffic should be allowed to continue. He felt that it is <br />extremely important for the public to realize that the Board is <br />not considering closing any part of the southerly portion of <br />Jungle Trail. Mr. Williams was in favor of restricting the <br />portion of the Trail through the proposed Windsor Polo Club to <br />pedestrian traffic. <br />Lomax Gwathmey, 23 Sea Horse Lane, Vero Beach, read a letter <br />into the record stating the position 'of the Civic Association: <br />THE CIVIC ASSOCIATION <br />of <br />Vero Beach and Indian River County <br />`Since 1968, preserving fostering and promoting the beauty, natural resources and <br />good government of Vero Beach and Indian River County." <br />February 22, 1988 <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />Indian River County <br />1840 - 25th Street <br />Vero Beach, FL 32960 <br />Re: Proposed Windsor Polo Club - North Barrier Island <br />Chairman Scurlock and Commissioners: <br />P. 0. Box 3381 <br />Vero Beach, FL <br />32964-3381 <br />The Board of Directors of the Civic Association of Vero <br />Beach and Indian River County at its regular meeting on <br />February 8, 1988 voted unanimously to support the concept of <br />the Windsor Polo Club proposed for the north portion of our <br />barrier island. <br />This support is predicated with the sole proviso that <br />there be no significant deleterious environmental effects. <br />The primary basis for our support of this proposal is <br />the advantageous density trade-off and a greatly lessened <br />impact on future infrastructure requirements. Also, its high <br />quality is most befitting to the character of our community. <br />73 <br />LFEB 23 1988 <br />'q <br />BOOK 1 FSE 73 <br />