My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/1/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
3/1/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:37:18 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:08:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/01/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CLASSIFICATION.#12: WATER STORAGE TANKS <br />Receive quotations from: <br />1. Lloyd & Associates <br />2. Boyle Engineering <br />3. Camp, Dresser & McKee <br />4. Masteller & Moler <br />CLASSIFICATION #13: The Committee recommends that the firms of <br />Marshall, McCully & Associates, Boyle Engineering, <br />Masteller & Moler Associates, Camp, Dresser & McKee <br />have a contract with pre-set rates for review. <br />Review will be assigned based on project type and <br />no conflict possibilities. <br />CLASSIFICATION #14: HYDROGEOLOGICAL STUDIES - separate from specific <br />design projects. Recommended are: <br />1. Camp, Dresser & McKee <br />2. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan <br />3. G & E Engineering <br />Firms will be chosen on a quotation basis with <br />elimination if conflict exists. <br />CLASSIFICATION #15: SPECIAL PROJECTS <br />The Committee recommends the selection of Camp, <br />Dresser & McKee, G & E Engineering, Post, Buckley, <br />Schuh & Jernigan, and Dyer, Riddle. One firm will <br />be picked according to what the project is. Cost <br />will be negotiated and will be submitted to the <br />Board. <br />CLASSIFICATION #16: WATER MASTER PLAN <br />The Committee recommends we continue with the <br />existing contract with Boyle Engineering with Camp, <br />Dresser & McKee as second firm and Post, Buckley, <br />Schuh & Jernigan as third firm which will be picked <br />if Boyle does not meet County requirements. <br />CLASSIFICATION #17: WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN <br />The Committee recommends we continue with the <br />existing contract with Camp, Dresser & McKee, with <br />Boyle Engineering as second firm and Post, Buckley, <br />Schuh & Jernigan as third firm which will be picked <br />if CDM does not meet County requirements. <br />CLASSIFICATION #18: COMPUTER ANALYSES - WATER <br />1. Boyle Engineering <br />2. Camp, Dresser & McKee <br />3. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan <br />Firms are ranked in the order in which negotiations <br />will proceed, dropping to the second, third, or <br />fourth firm if negotiations are not successful. <br />56 <br />MAR 11988 <br />BOOK 71 PACE 154 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.