My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/1/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
3/1/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:37:18 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:08:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/01/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CLASSIFICATION #19: COMPUTER ANALYSES - WASTEWATER <br />1. Camp, Dresser & McKee <br />2. Boyle Engineering <br />3. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan <br />Firms are ranked in the order in which negotiations <br />will proceed, dropping to the second, third, or <br />fourth firm if negotiations are not successful. <br />CLASSIFICATION #20: COMPUTER SOFTWARE UTILITIES <br />1. Camp, Dresser & McKee <br />2. Boyle Engineering <br />3. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan <br />CLASSIFICATION #21: FORMULATION OF ASSESSMENTS <br />1. Lloyd & Associates <br />2. Camp, Dresser & McKee <br />3, Masteller & Moler Associates <br />Each project engineer will be selected, based on <br />specific need. <br />CLASSIFICATION #22:}IMPACT FEE REVIEW - WATER <br />CLASSIFICATION #23:}IMPACT FEE REVIEW - WASTEWATER <br />The Committee will send out Requests for Proposals. <br />when needed. <br />Commissioner Eggert requested that it be explained what <br />Classifications #13 and #15 are, i.e., what does review mean in <br />this context? <br />Utilities Director Pinto advised that if, for instance, we <br />had a development submitted to us that we wanted some help in <br />reviewing, we would select one of these firms to do that work, <br />•but after they preset their rates, we would select a firm based <br />on whether we anticipated any conflict or not. For example, if <br />we were going to put Grand Harbor out for review, we wouldn't <br />hire the same firm who designed it to do the review. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked about #15 and if that would be <br />something like a computer project, and was informed it is Tike <br />Blue Cypress, for example. <br />57 <br />A 11988 <br />BOOK 71 PNCE 155 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.