Laserfiche WebLink
TO: Charles P. Balczun <br />County Administrator <br />DATE: April 26, 1988 FILE: <br />DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />Robert M. Ke <br />Community De <br />WABASSO PARTNERSHIP REQUEST <br />TO AMEND THE CL ZONING DIS- <br />TRICT REGULATIONS TO PERMIT <br />ting, AICP SUBJECT: COMMERCIAL GREENHOUSES AND <br />elopment Director NURSERIES AS A PERMITTED <br />THROUGH: Gary M. Schindler /7/ <br />Chief, Long Range Planning <br />USE <br />David C. Nearing Wabasso Partn. <br />FROM: staff Planner REFERENCES: DIS:DAVE <br />It is requested that the information presented herein be given <br />formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at <br />their regular meeting of May 10, 1988. <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: <br />David Croom, acting on behalf of the Wabasso Partnership, has <br />submitted an application to amend the text of the zoning ordi- <br />nance. This application is to amend Section 19, CL: Limited <br />Commercial District, to permit Commercial Greenhouses and Nur- <br />series as a permitted use. Currently, Commercial Greenhouses and <br />Nurseries are a permitted agricultural use in the CG, General <br />Commercial District; CH, Heavy Commercial District; IL, Light <br />Industrial District; and IG, General Industrial District. <br />As noted on the attached application, the reason that the appli- <br />cants are requesting this amendment is that they are the current <br />owners of an old nonconforming commercial nursery site situated <br />in a CL district in the Wabasso area. This nursery had <br />originally received site plan approval in 1978 when the property <br />was zoned C -1A, Restricted Commercial District, which permitted <br />Commercial Greenhouses and Nurseries. However, in January of <br />1986, the property was rezoned to CL during the Comprehensive <br />County -wide nonresidential zoning conversion. <br />Because the CL district did not permit commercial nurseries and <br />greenhouses, the use became a nonconforming use. Nonconforming <br />uses may continue to exist as long as the use is not destroyed by <br />more than 50% or discontinued for more than 90 days; <br />they also may not be enlarged or expanded. In the case of the <br />subject nursery, the use was discontinued approximately one year <br />ago. For this reason, the use ceased to exist and could not be <br />reestablished without the property being rezoned to a district in <br />which a commercial greenhouse/nursery is permitted, or through <br />amending the ordinance to permit the use in the CL zoning <br />district. Because the staff would recommend against a rezoning <br />of thisproperty to a more intense district, the applicant <br />decided to submit this request for an amendment. <br />On April 14, 1988, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted <br />unanimously to recommend approval of this request. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the request <br />will be performed. This analysis will examine the potential <br />impacts of adding the proposed use to the other uses allowed in <br />the CL district. This examination will then identify and <br />evaluate alternatives to the requested amendment. Finally, a <br />recommendation will be madebased on the analysis of the request <br />and the alternatives. As with a rezoning, the Commissioners may <br />accept or deny the staff's recommendation in full or in part. A <br />denial of this request will be final unless appealed. <br />13 <br />Mean ` 0 1988 <br />Boot( 72 PAGE 293 <br />