5/17/1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MAY 17 1988 BOOK 72 I G[374 about the specific uses was to delete any reference to uses whatsoever on the site plan. Therefore, the provided site plan does not specify any uses for the site at this time. 2) This item deals with trip generation. The criteria that applies in the ordinance says that traffic shall not be generated in excess of that customary for residential uses. Basically, you. look at the site and how it can be developed residentially, and you consider the number of trips and the type of trips and compare those to what would be the number of trips and type of traffic for the proposed use. Staff disagrees with the trip generation calculations by the applicant, and that is that the entire site can be developed with 4 single family lots, either with mobile homes or single family houses, yielding approximately 29 average daily trips. With the manufacturing/warehouse building, there would be 50 trips per day plus trips for the existing mobile home at build -out of 57 trips per day. Therefore, the volume of trips would exceed what would normally be there if it were residentially developed, as well as the type of trips, which would be mainly the trucks that service that use. Commissioner Eggert noted that the 1/2 acre lot restriction is because of the Health Department, and Mr. Boling explained that there is also the assumption that at no time in the foreseeable future would there be water and sewer service available at that site. 3) The applicant failed to size the proposed use in the manner that satisfies the employee situation. One of the criteria in the ordinances is that "activities conducted be by members of the family living within the residence." The Kirries have told us that there are 4 people living in the residence, who presently are employed in the existing 2600 S.F. facility. The applicant 31