5/17/1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

did not give us any information as to whether there were any employees outside of the family that work there at present. However, if you use the ITE Trip Generation Manual, which gives 1.84 employees per 1000 square feet of manufacturing facilities, that is right in line with what they have now -- 4 employees for 2600 S.F. If you expanded that to a total of 8200 S.F., you would have approximately 15 employees. Obviously, in order to have that many employees, they would have to use employees outside the residence and not family members, which would violate the criteria in the ordinance. If you were to use the warehousing standards in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, you still would need approximately 11 employees for an 8200 S.F. facility. Using those figures, they would be in violation of that criteria by having to use employees that do not live in the residence. 4), 5), and 6) Mr. Boling pointed out that the last 3 items of concern regarding adequate parking, sidewalks, and paving have been addressed in writing and agreed to. Basically, you are looking at a facility which is of such a scale that the trip generation and requirements cannot be met. The family residence employee requirement cannot be met, and the uses are still not specified on the site plan. For those reasons, staff is recommending denial of the appeal. Commissioner Wheeler understood that the original ROSE -4 ordinance (87-22) stated that only family members could work there and that non -family employees would have to be let go. Mr. Boling felt it was staff's interpretation at the time the original ordinance was adopted that if there were non -family employees, those positions would be grandfathered in, but Chairman Scurlock understood that if you expanded the use, you could not expand and hire additional non -family employees, and MAY 1? 1988 32 BOOK 72 PAH 3 5 L_ 1