Laserfiche WebLink
Pr - <br />MAY 17 198 <br />BOOK 72 FACE 378 <br />approximately 66 trips based on the 7.26 acres of the project <br />size. <br />2) The other issue is the capture rate that exists in the ROSE -4 <br />District in that it is a unique district with regard to family <br />member employees and you reduce the number of trips out of the <br />site for the commercial uses. ITE states that 3.89 trips in per <br />employee are generated. If you take those trips times the 4 <br />employees that currently are employed in this business, it would <br />yield 16 trips. They concur with staff's calculations that 50 <br />trips would be generated by the proposed additions and the <br />existing structures, but if you net out the 16 trips that would <br />be captured internally, that would yield approximately 34 trips <br />associated with this project. Therefore, you would have <br />approximately 16 trips that would be generated by the residential <br />use that are in the 34 trips for commercial activities. <br />Commissioner Eggert pointed out that although we are not <br />allowing them to have outside employees, we are saying that they <br />are going to make these trips to get there. She realized, <br />though, that there are other factors. <br />Chairman Scurlock assumed that with the expanded <br />manufacturing use, there would be an increase of trips involving <br />the raw materials being brought to the site and the products <br />being taken off site for sale, and Mr. Terpening explained that <br />is why the trip rates went up to 50, but 16 trips are captured on <br />site. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if there is any requirement that the <br />family members have to live on site, and Mr. Terpening believed <br />there is. <br />Director Keating felt that would mean that they would have <br />to live there forever, and staff's interpretation has been that <br />the children could move off site at some point in the future <br />without them being in violation of the ordinance. <br />35 <br />