5/17/1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planner Boling explained that although the capture rate is deducted, you have to remember that there is an existing residential unit on site, and youstill have to factor in the 7 trips per day for the residential unit. Staff disagrees with the residential development potential of the entire site. The 1.97 acre site is the area of development that this application corresponds to and where 4 single Tots could be developed. He pointed out that the original site plan had reference to sales, and the criteria of the ordinance prohibits sales activities to the general public on site. Staff wanted that point 'covered as well. Chairman Scurlock asked what the applicant would have to do to properly size the proposed uses with regard to trip generation, and Mr. Boling explained that Mr. Kirrie would have to get the size of the operation down to where the total trips of the site for the proposed use would be Tess than the total trips for the site if it were developed into single family lots. Commissioner Eggert asked what would happen if Mr. Kirrie wouldn't be allowed to do Phase 3, and Mr. Boling stated that he would have to do whatever he could do to reach the 29 trips that oe can have. Chairman Scurlock felt that he was hearing that there could be an expansion, but it would have to be with a lesser number of trips, specifically 29. Commissioner E99ert asked if 2900 S.F. of building covers that, and Mr. Boling explained that there are 7 trips for the existing residential unit, so you have 22 average daily trips to work with for the total amount of manufacturing facility they could have there. Chairman Scurlock understood than that Mr. Kirrie could expand. by 200 feet, but he is requesting to expand to 5000 feet. Attorney O'Haire emphasized that there is no disagreement about the proposed expansion, and the trips it would generate, 36 MAY 111988 BOOK t 2 'g F 379