My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/31/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
5/31/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:00:10 PM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:18:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/31/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- M M <br />Thus, the zoning code clearly requires sidewalks on both sides of <br />roads within non-residential subdivisions. These requirements <br />were recently considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission and <br />were subsequently adopted into code by the Board of County <br />Commissioners in Ordinance 88-9. <br />Section 11(b) of the subdivision ordinance states that the Board <br />shall not approve a waiver (variance) from the subdivision <br />ordinance requirements unless it finds all four of the following: <br />1. "The particular physical conditions, shape and topography of <br />the specific property involved would cause an undue hardship <br />to the applicant if the strict letter of the ordinance is <br />carried out;" <br />2. "The granting of the waiver will not cause injury to adjacent <br />property or any natural resource;" <br />3. "The conditions, upon which a request for waiver are based, <br />are unique to the property for which the waiver is sought and <br />are not generally applicable to other property in the <br />adjacent areas and do not result from actions of the <br />applicant;" and <br />4. "The waiver is consistent with the intent and purpose of the <br />Indian River County Zoning Ordinance, the Indian River County <br />Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and this ordinance." <br />It is staff's opinion that these four criteria are not satisfied <br />(see the attached application for the applicant's response). <br />1. The applicant agrees with staff that meeting the code and <br />providing for sidewalks would not cause an undue hardship to <br />the applicant because of any physical conditions or character- <br />istics of the site. <br />2. Granting the waiver could adversely affect surrounding <br />properties because the sidewalk system would not be provided, <br />and pedestrian circulation would be impeded. <br />3. The applicant is contending that because of the type and <br />location of the subdivision, the sidewalks would serve no <br />purpose. The applicant states there will be little pedes- <br />trian traffic within the subdivision. <br />Sidewalks are required in all industrial zoning districts. <br />Industrial districts are urban in character, are employment <br />centers, and will generate pedestrian use. The basis of the <br />request is not unique. The applicant's contention is that <br />sidewalks are not needed in an industrial park. Industrial <br />parks and projects occur throughout the County, and are <br />similarly situated. Granting this request would compel the <br />County to amend current ordinances so that sidewalks would <br />not be required in any industrial parks. <br />4. The applicant is contending that sidewalks should not be <br />required because this industrial subdivision is below the 3 <br />units per acre density threshold for sidewalks. Density is <br />not relevant to industrial use; sidewalks are required in the <br />industrial districts because of their urban character. <br />In summary, the applicant's rationale for not providing sidewalks <br />in the Glendale Industrial Park, is that sidewalks should not be <br />provided because of the non-residential nature of the subdivision. <br />41 BOOK 72 PnN 446 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.