Laserfiche WebLink
Director Davis noted that it is still dedicated R/W and is <br />still public ownership, and he did not see why this would <br />preclude us from maintaining it. <br />Commissioner Eggert felt the whole point of this was to make <br />that development take care of this, but Chairman Scurlock felt it <br />is an unusual situation. He believed both the property owners <br />and the development are looking for assurance they will have an <br />attractive entranceway. <br />Commissioner Eggert just wanted to be sure that someone <br />maintains this landscaping so it doesn't become an eyesore. <br />George Kulczycki of General Development Corporation believed <br />the reason GDC got into the agreement in the first place was that <br />_-hey wanted to plant trees on both sides of the entrance road to <br />hide some of the older homes back there. He noted this issue <br />came up recently when they were talking about putting sidewalks <br />in, and he felt they can get the sidewalks behind the trees; they <br />do want to keep trees there. If they were to lose the trees, he <br />felt they would appreciate the county just taking over the <br />maintenance of that area. <br />Chairman Scurlock pointed out that at least this amendment <br />provides a vehicle for someone to maintain the landscaping for <br />some period of time. <br />Commissioner Eggert inquired whether anyone has asked the <br />Property Owners Association if they would be back-up to this and <br />was informed they don't want the responsibility. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0) <br />authorized the Chairman to execute the Amendment <br />re change in maintenance responsibility. <br />SAID AMENDMENT WILL BE MADE A PART OF THE RECORD WHEN FULLY <br />EXECUTED AND RECEIVED. <br />59 BOOK 74' 'E',� ,,IE 46 <br />L MAY 3 11993 <br />