My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/31/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
5/31/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:00:10 PM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:18:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/31/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ANALYSIS <br />Change Order #1 will reduce the contract price by a total amount of <br />$410,467.25. <br />Change Order #2 - will result in total savings of $45,154.44 by direct <br />purchase of the aforementioned items. This figure is composed of 1% <br />saved in bonding and a 6% savings from sales tax. The project's cost <br />will be reduced by $45,154.44; however, the total contract price will <br />be reduced by $658,715.00 as the County will directly purchase the <br />items listed in Change Order #2. <br />Approval of both of these proposed change orders will reduce the cost <br />of the project by $455,621.69 and will reduce the contract price by <br />$1,069,182.30. <br />The Department of Utility Services feels acceptance of these change - <br />orders will not affect the successful construction of operation of the <br />system and will substantially reduce the capital cost incurred by the <br />County.. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the <br />:.:ard of County Commissioners approve and authorize the aforementioned <br />nge orders by execution of the attached Environmental <br />Protection Agency (EPA) change order forms. <br />In regard to Change Order #2, Director Pinto explained that <br />he met with the contractor and the EPA and found because the way <br />the project is designed there is a major cost in the equipment <br />needed to take the place of these people's septic tanks. It is a <br />little fiberglass chamber with a pump in it, and it is a very <br />high cost item. The contractor did not have any problem with <br />removing that equipment from his contract and letting us purchase <br />it directly. The suppliers of the pump chamber will give us <br />adequate warranty, and EPA is also satisfied that we will have <br />substantial warranty. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Bird, the -Board unanimously (4-0) approved <br />Change Orders #1 and #2 to the Rockridge Sanitary <br />Sewer System Contract. <br />MAY 3 11999 77 . Boor 482 <br />� J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.