My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/8/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
6/8/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:00:10 PM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:16:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/08/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
don't build. The Chairman believed Treasure Coast Builders <br />supports impact fees; the one thing that comes up is making it <br />equitable. <br />Vice Mayor Winchester did not question the need for the <br />money; his only comment was that politically and philosophically <br />we need to find a way to make what we are doing a little more <br />palatable to those who pay the bill. <br />Commissioner Bird requested that Attorney Vitunac explain <br />about impact fees and how they work as far as the county and the <br />municipalities are concerned, where the funds are collected, <br />where they are spent, etc. <br />Attorney Vitunac stated that new people coming in will pay a <br />share based on a study, and he felt it would help if Director <br />Davis gave a synopsis of his report. <br />City Manager Little advised that the City staff has had a <br />chance to review Jim's report, and when it is ready for formal <br />action, they are ready to take a position. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if the municipalities can opt in or <br />out, and Attorney Vitunac confirmed that it is optional. <br />Chairman Scurlock noted that basically you develop a capital <br />improvement program where you can pay for the new improvements <br />that will be caused by new growth, and then you have a variety of <br />options. You can zone it as we did with traffic and collect <br />funds in certain zones, and fees could be different in each zone <br />or you could have an overall impact fee and not zone it. There <br />are a variety of approaches. <br />Attorney Vitunac emphasized that the main thing about impact <br />fees is that they bring the new person up to the standard that is <br />already there; they are not a source of money to improve the <br />whole program for the future; that has to come out of tax money <br />or user fees. One of our towns dropped out of our road fee <br />program because they said they wanted to do their own impact fees <br />and pave all their roads, but the problem is that their standard <br />is dirt roads and they can't do that with impact fees. They <br />7 <br />BOOK 73 FACE 07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.