My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/8/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
6/8/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:00:10 PM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:16:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/08/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
don't understand impact fees, and Attorney Vitunac believed this <br />really needs an educational program. <br />Chairman Scurlock further noted that today government is <br />being forced to look at alternate sources of funding because many <br />traditional sources have dried up, and he, therefore, felt we <br />must look at a combination of sources to fund the program. <br />Unfortunately, it seems your desire is usually a lot bigger than <br />your ability to pay. <br />County Attorney Vitunac wished to point out that there is <br />another possibility. When the County took over the countywide <br />library services, libraries were just merged into the General <br />Fund of the county. It is perfectly possible to take Recreation <br />and make it a countywide obligation under the General Fund with <br />no referendum, no agreements, etc.; then you would just rely on <br />the.County Commission to provide countywide recreation, and they <br />would involve themselves with the City's assets by buying or <br />leasing or some other arrangement. It does not have to be a <br />special district which we are finding cumbersome in some other <br />areas. That is a major decision. <br />Commissioner Wheeler felt if the public wants services and <br />is willing to vote for the district, then they should pay for it, <br />but they should not have it pushed on them by any elected board. <br />He very strongly preferred a referendum and a dependent taxing <br />district for Recreation. <br />Chairman Scurlock also liked the concept of a special <br />dependent district. <br />Discussion ensued regarding who would be the governing body <br />of the district and how this would be worked out, and Mayor Macht <br />believed what we really need is all these alternatives spelled <br />out so the Council and Commission can look them over. He still <br />felt the first step is programming. He noted that a major part <br />of the City's taxes go into their recreation program; so, they <br />have a proprietary feeling about it. <br />13 BOOK 6 cA P.",�E 08 i <br />JUS � i9 <br />L- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.