My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/28/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
6/28/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:00:10 PM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:21:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/28/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Requested Modification: <br />On April 19, 1988, Lloyd & Associates, Inc. submitted an adminis- <br />trative approval application on behalf of The Moorings Center, <br />Inc. to remove the required sidewalks along Bowline Drive and <br />install additional buffering to shield the proposed shopping <br />center from the single family residences to the west of this site. <br />Increased buffering was proposed by eliminating the sidewalk and <br />using right-of-way for berming and landscaping. The net result <br />would be a berm 2' to 3' higher and more area that could be <br />landscaped. Such use_ of the public 'road right-of-way would <br />require Public Work's approval and elimination of the required <br />sidewalk. <br />Pursuant to Section 19(L) of the zoning code, which requires <br />sidewalks to be provided in such projects, staff denied the <br />application due to the lack of authority to grant such a waiver. <br />On May 2, 1988, staff received a letter appealing this decision to <br />the Planning and Zoning Commission from Lloyd & Associates, .Inc. <br />on behalf of the Moorings Development Company. <br />At its regular meeting of May 26, 1988, the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission voted 4 to 2 to deny the Moorings Center, -Inc.'s <br />request to overturn staff's decision not to grant the site plan <br />modification. The applicant is now appealing to the Board of <br />County Commissioners the denial by the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission. <br />ANALYSIS & ALTERNATIVES: <br />Analysis: <br />When the administrative approval application was submitted, the <br />developer maintained that one of the reasons why this request to <br />eliminate sidewalks was made was, that by doing so, more room <br />would be available for providing additional buffering. In staff's <br />opinion, there are two issues in this case: <br />(1) the removal of required sidewalks along Bowline Drive; <br />and <br />(2) the desirability and opportunities for additional <br />buffering between the shopping center and the <br />single-family residences located on the west side of <br />Bowline Drive. <br />These issues are separate. If sidewalks are needed (as required), <br />then they should be provided. Extraordinary buffering can be <br />accommodated, through design measures, along with the sidewalks. <br />Provision of sidewalks does not preclude buffering. <br />Section 19W and 23.5(e)5.b of the zoning code require sidewalks <br />to be provided in conjunction with all projects requiring site <br />plan approval. Placement of sidewalks is controlled by standards <br />from the Manual of Uniform Standards for Design, Construction and <br />Maintenance of Streets and Highways (by FDCT), which calls for <br />sidewalks along right-of-way frontage. These requirements provide <br />for sidewalks surrounding the project, connecting the site to the <br />major S.R. A -1-A bikepath and The Moorings residential area. This <br />resulting system accommodates pedestrian traffic to and through <br />the commercial project, providing pedestrians safe access to and <br />from The Moorings residential area, the shopping center, and along <br />S.R. A -1-A. Buffering requirements from the zoning code have been <br />satisfied by the approved site plan. <br />15 <br />►JUN 19 BOOK o7 F a �t 108 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.