Laserfiche WebLink
Ruth Chapman, resident of Rockridge, commented that when the <br />hearing was held regarding the PRO District, she accused Mr. <br />Kutschinski of not living up to a moral obligation, but she has <br />since found out that he did give footage on his western boundary <br />to the City to widen the road, and she wished to apologize <br />publicly since she accused him publicly. <br />In regard to the issue at hand, Mrs. Chapman quite agreed <br />with Mr. Barkett. She stated that the people were unaware of <br />what PRO stood for and felt either a doctor's or dentist's office <br />would be allowed, which not only would contribute to the welfare <br />of the people in Rockridge but there would be a smaller building, <br />more parking space and more buffering. As far as the traffic is <br />concerned, she felt if the buffering is done correctly at that <br />site, and Mr. Kutschinski has the setbacks needed at that corner, <br />it would help Rockridge improve that corner and eliminate some of <br />the problems. The people who live directly across from where <br />egress would be undoubtedly would not like it; however, if <br />something were put into the roadway so the people could only make <br />a right hand turn out onto 6th Avenue, she did not think it would <br />be all that bad. Mrs. Chapman emphasized that she did feel it <br />would benefit all to have that type office in there rather than <br />18 offices of various types, which could not be controlled as <br />much as the medical offices could. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Bird, the Board unanimously referred the <br />proposed amendment to the PRO District to be re- <br />viewed on the basis of a Special Exception and <br />putting in some more definitive language as <br />discussed. <br />19 <br />BOOK .13 F'A"f. 70 <br />