Laserfiche WebLink
r � � <br />BID 89-7 - ROAD STABILIZATION MATERIAL, TERM CONTRACT <br />The Board reviewed memo from Purchasing Manager Ambler: <br />TO: William G. Collins II DATE: August 12, 1988 FILE: <br />Acting County Administrator <br />SUBJECT: <br />AWARD OF IRC BID #89-7 <br />ROAD STABILIZATION <br />MATERIAL, TERM OONTRACT <br />FRO - REFERENCES: <br />Gus Ambler, C.P.M. <br />Purchasing Manager <br />1. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: <br />Bids were opened Wednesday, August 10, 1988 at 2:00 p.m. <br />for IRC Bid #89-7. <br />11 Invitations to Bid were mailed. 6 Bids were received <br />including 1 No Bid. <br />This bid was advertised in the newspaper. <br />2. ALTER=m AND ANALYSIS: <br />The low bid for Road Stabilization Materials delivered <br />(Item 1) was submitted by Black Hawk Quarries. The <br />price quoted is 47% lower then the other prices bid. <br />The usage requirements for Item 2 don't justify an award <br />at this time. <br />Estimated yearly expenditures under the terms -of this bid are <br />$85,000.00. <br />3. FUNDING: <br />No requisitions are currently being held in the Purchasing Dept. <br />No purchase orders will be issued until our approved requisition <br />is received from the Budget Office. <br />4. RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends that we award Item 1 to Black Hawk Quarries and <br />that no award be made for Item 2 at this time. <br />Acting Administrator Collins advised that this Bid normally <br />would be on the Consent Agenda, but it was rewritten. Staff <br />originally recommended awarding the low bid on Item I to Black <br />Hawk Quarries because they were about 47% lower than the other <br />bids, but the bid specifications called for a combined bid on <br />Part I and Part 2. What we have determined is that the bid on <br />Road Stabilization Materials Delivered was so low that the <br />s4 <br />U G 2 198 BOOK 73 F� lu 589 <br />