Laserfiche WebLink
AUTHORIZATION TO PREPARE A PLANNING CONSULTANT RFP <br />The Board reviewed memo from the Community Development <br />Director: <br />TO: The Honorable Members of The Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Robert M. Keating, AICP AA4 <br />Director, Community Development <br />SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO PREPARE A PLANNING <br />CONSULTANT RFP <br />DATE: August 26, 1988 <br />It is requested that the information herein presented be given <br />formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its <br />regular meeting of September 6, 1988.'. <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: <br />Indian River County's new comprehensive plan must be completed and <br />submitted to the state by September 1, 1989. Although the intent <br />has been to try to do as much of the plan as possible in-house <br />with existing staff, it has been recognized since the beginning of <br />the comp plan preparation process that the existing staff may be <br />unable to complete the work due to the time demands of on-going <br />activities. Because of that concern, $80,000 was budgeted in FY <br />87-88 for comprehensive plan consulting services. <br />During FY 87-88, no consultants have been retained by the County <br />for comprehensive plan activities; consequently, none of the <br />$80,000 has been expended or committed. However, the Community <br />Development Department's FY 88-89 budget, as approved in budget <br />hearings, contains $50,000 for comprehensive planning consultant <br />services. Therefore, funds are available to retain consultant <br />services in FY 88-89. <br />Although a substantial amount of work has been done on the plan, <br />there is a considerable amount left to do. Some work has been <br />done on all required plan elements, with some elements further <br />along than others. Recently, however, two senior members of the <br />staff (Mike Miller, and Gary Schindler) who had been responsible <br />for several comp plan elements resigned and accepted positions <br />with other agencies. Therefore, less staff time is available to <br />devote to comprehensive planning activities, and comp plan pre- <br />paration timeframes have not been met. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: <br />With the recent loss of key staff, the inability to attract <br />experienced personnel because of low pay scales, and the amount of <br />on-going planning responsibilities and non -comp plan projects <br />assigned to the staff, it will not be possible to meet the compre- <br />hensive planning requirements with existing staff. Since the <br />level of completion varies for each required comp plan element, <br />the work remaining is different for each. Some elements have been <br />drafted through the analysis section, while others are less <br />complete. <br />The only workable alternative for meeting the County's comprehen- <br />sive plan preparation requirements appears to be obtaining consul- <br />tant services. However, several options exist with regard to <br />84 <br />1`Ak <br />�00V 74 84 <br />