Laserfiche WebLink
Alternative #2 <br />Deny the DOT's request for a Joint Project Agreement and not <br />authorize street lighting along US 1. <br />RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING <br />It is recommended that Alternative #1 be approved whereby the <br />Chairman be authorized to execute all four copies of the Joint <br />Project Agreement and the County resolution be adopted. Funding <br />will be considered in the FY89/90 budget in the amount of $6,000. <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />Referenced letter with Joint Project Agreement and County <br />Resolution <br />Director Davis commented that U.S.I is presently lit through <br />the City of Vero Beach up to about 10th Street, and this would <br />continue on the urban section to the south. <br />Commissioner Bowman asked why we need this, and Director.. <br />Davis advised that it is a safety amenity to the project. <br />Basically in an urban area such as the U.S.I. corridor, the DOT <br />greenbook pretty much mandates looking into appropriate fighting <br />when a section is completely urbanized. <br />Commissioner Eggert agreed that it is needed, and Vice <br />Chairman Wheeler stated that he was in favor of lighting all the <br />way down to Oslo Road. <br />OCT 41988 <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commis- <br />sioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved <br />Alternative #1 and adopted Resolution 88-97 authorizing <br />the Vice Chairman to execute said Joint Project Agree- <br />ment with the DOT. <br />41 <br />poor 74 Fa [438 <br />