Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Eggert had a concern that the residential could <br />become a problem in the future; so, why exempt them? <br />After further discussion, the Board generally agreed that <br />exemption should be changed as discussed, and then this will be <br />considered at the pubiit.hearing. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commis- <br />sioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously authorized staff <br />to schedule and advertise a public hearing on the Fire <br />Alarm Ordinance with the suggested change to be held in <br />approximately one month. <br />BLANKENSHIP HEARING BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />County Attorney Vitunac reviewed his memo, suggesting that <br />we reschedule the hearing for January: <br />TO: <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Char es' P. Vitunac, County Attorney <br />DATE: October 26,' 1988 <br />RE: <br />BLANKENSHIP HEARING BEFORE B.C.C. <br />B.C.C. MEETING 11/1/88 <br />The attorney representing William Blankenship has notified <br />this office that he will be out of town during the week that <br />the Board had previously chosen for his appeal hearing, <br />i.e., November 17, 1988. Therefore, he would like to <br />reschedule the hearing. <br />We request direction from the Board in this regard. <br />Some discussion arose as to whether we should reschedule it <br />sooner, and Attorney Vitunac felt that the longer we wait, the <br />better it is for us. Mr. Blankenship's criminal trial is set for <br />November 7th. If he is convicted, it will strengthen our <br />position, and there is always the possibility he could get <br />another job somewhere. <br />87 <br />NOV 11988 <br />BOOK 75 FAGS 87 <br />