My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/8/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
11/8/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:27:06 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:33:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/08/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY R.O. PLANT <br />WITH CAMP, DRESSER & McKEE <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/28/88: <br />TO: WILLIAM G. COLLINS, II <br />ACTING COUNTY ADMINIS <br />THRU: TERRANCE G. PINTO <br />DIRECTOR OF UTILITY 'RVICES <br />FROM: WILLIAM F. McCAIN �, <br />PROJECTS ENGINEER %` <br />DEPARTMENT OF UTIL T SERVICES <br />DATE: OCTOBER 28,-1Q&8 <br />SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY <br />R.O. PLANT WITH CAMP, DRESSER AND MCKEE, INC. (CDM) <br />PROJECT NUMBERS UW -88 -01 -WC UW -88=O2 -WC:- UW -88 -03 -WC <br />BACKGROUND <br />Sometime ago, we undertook a selection process to pick a consulting <br />firm to handle our water treatment plant engineering; the top ranked <br />firm was Camp, Dresser and McKee, -Inc. Since CDM was ranked number <br />one over our previous consultant, D.S.S. Engineers Inc., it was <br />decided to switch all ongoing projects to the newly selected <br />consultant. At the onset of this project, we decided not to have <br />approval on all of the funds necessary for engineering services on <br />this project until it was determined exactly what would be required <br />during construction. <br />ANALYSIS <br />The consulting firm of Camp, Dresser and McKee are prepared to <br />assume engineering responsibilities for the remainder of this <br />project. The Engineering services they have proposed cover the <br />identical scope of services as those proposed by D.S.S., our <br />previous consultant on this project, and are for approximately the <br />same cost, as follows: <br />DSS CDM <br />Engineering costs $40,613.00 $41,900.00 <br />associated with R. O. <br />Plant expansion <br />completion <br />The monies for this work have been set aside and will be transferred <br />from the Utilities Department Impact Fee Fund to the project <br />account. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Indian River <br />County Board of County Commissioners approve the above action and, <br />by doing so, authorize the signing of the forthcoming work <br />authorization. <br />NOV 8 1988 <br />37 <br />BOOK .10 fr{CE LJ5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.