Laserfiche WebLink
DEC 2 0 19E18 BOOK 75 PGE 429 <br />TO: William G. Collins II �«l <br />Acting County Administrator <br />FROM: James W. Davis, P.E. <br />Public Works Director <br />SUBJECT: Request for Traffic Impact Fee Credit - Widening of SR <br />AlA Two Miles South of 17th Street Causeway - <br />Sandpointe Subdivision <br />REF. Letter: Fred R. Banfield,%Carter & Associates to James <br />Davis dated 10-31-88 <br />DATE: December 14, 1988 <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />The Florida DOT has required that the developer of Sandpointe <br />Subdivision widen A1A beyond the standard storage/transition <br />length so that a continuous three -lane section would exist <br />between Ocean Ridge Subdivision and Seagrove Subdivision. The <br />result of the DOT's requirements has been an additional cost of <br />$45,801.55 to the developer. At this time, the developer is <br />requesting that the County grant a Traffic Impact Fee Credit for <br />the additional cost. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />The additional cost of •=$45;801.55 includes $36,931.55 for <br />additional roadway pavement and $8,870 for incidental work. In <br />the past, such as the Marbrissa Project in Indian River Shores, <br />the County has given the developer a TIF credit for work beyond <br />his project's impact, if the work is on the County's 20 Year Road <br />Plan or if approved by the Board of County Commissioners. In <br />this case, the County's 20 Year Plan include widening of A1A from <br />SR60 to a point three miles south of SR60. This project is just <br />beyond the three mile limit. <br />On Dec. 14, 1988, the Transportation Planning Committee approved <br />this request. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve a <br />Traffic Impact Fee Credit of $36,931.55 for this additional work <br />as requested by the developer of Sandpointe Subdivision (100 <br />lots). <br />Administrator Collins further clarified that the DOT had <br />requested that section of the road be widened for safety reasons, <br />and since this was not a work item on the County's 20 Year Road <br />Plan, he did not think widening at the request of the DOT meets <br />the criteria to qualify for a Traffic Impact Fee Credit. He did <br />not want to set a precedent and he, therefore, asked that the <br />Board deny the developer's request. <br />Commissioner Wheeler asked if we haven't done this <br />somewhere else, possibly Marbrissa, and Commissioner Bowman <br />29 <br />