Laserfiche WebLink
F E B `i 1989 <br />BOOK .76 FADE 48 <br />if only certain firms are licensed by the state to do this. That <br />was confirmed. <br />Utilities Director Pinto further emphasized that all these <br />things must be scheduled to be done in a certain sequence to meet <br />the operation needs. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Eggert, the Board -unanimously approved staff <br />recommendation and also set a 30 -day period <br />for the Utilities Director to come back and report to <br />the Board on the status of possible litigation against <br />Dames & Moore, or at least advise how we can get that <br />issue resolved one way or the other. <br />EFFLUENT REUSE MASTER PLAN - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT <br />Director Pinto reviewed the following, stressing that the <br />limiting factor in a treatment plant is effluent disposal: <br />DATE: JANUARY 19, 1989 <br />TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />THRU: TERRANCE G. PINTQ' * <br />DIRECTOR OF UTILYT'y RVICES <br />FROM: WILLIAM F. McCAI �� <br />PROJECTS ENGINEER <br />DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES <br />SUBJECT: EFFLUENT REUSE MASTER PLAN <br />PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT BY POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH AND <br />JERNIGAN, INC. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />On November 15, 1988, the Board of County Commissioners approved a <br />contract with Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jernigan, Inc. (PBS&J). <br />Prior to this contract approval, PBS&J was shortlisted as our <br />primary consultant for Wastewater Effluent Disposal. In keeping <br />with this action, we are now requesting that PBS&J provide us with <br />an Effluent Reuse Master Plan. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />Due to the large volume of independent effluent disposal reports <br />which exist throughout the County and the difficulty in arriving at <br />48 <br />