2/21/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION ON THE MOTION TO TABLE for a week. It was voted on and carried 3 to 2 with Commissioners Bird and Scurlock voting in oppos`i'tion. John Dean, Architect, who has been attending the workshops regarding the proposed Jungle Trail Management plan, felt if the Board is going to make policy decisions next week, alt that has been developed at the workshops should be brought forward prior to that or the public has wasted their time. Commissioner Bird wondered if we are ready one week from now to make all those decisions. He explained that the reason he voted against tabling is that he believed Sea Oaks has met the intent of the rules they played under and we ought to approve their project and then continue the process of developing our P 9 plan for the Trail under a proper time scale. Commissioner Scurlock commented that he personally was ready to vote on Sea Oaks request today although he did want to ask them to modify their plan to some extent. If they had been willing to increase the height of some of the low levet plantings, he would have been ready to vote today. Commissioner Eggert agreed that if some of the low areas could be filled in, she would not have so much trouble with their plan, and Commissioner Scurlock noted that we could reconsider the Motion to table. Commissioner Bowman expressed her feeling that the Community Development Department has been confused with alt these workshops and varying opinions and did not believe they have had clear direction as to just what we want Jungle Trail to look like. She believed if all these people from the workshops can get back together, it can be thrashed out in a week and we can get some definite language into this ordinance. Some discussion ensued in regard to reconsidering the Motion to table, and Attorney Barkett informed the Board that Sea Oaks FEB 21lot-IJ 43 BOOK 76