My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/21/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
2/21/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:39:58 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:41:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/21/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FEB 2 1 196 <br />BOOK /6 PA E 02 <br />road R/W, and, therefore, she would like to see the different <br />options. <br />Darrell McQueen of McQueen Associates, representing the Town <br />of Orchid and the Polo Club, informed the Board that he was just <br />here to meet with Director Keating to see what we can do to <br />protect the Trail and buffer it through the Town of Orchid. He <br />had not intended to speak, but he felt it is not completely fair <br />to Sea Oaks to rely on what he has done. They have a development <br />that is already under way and has been site planned for quite <br />some time while he is working with raw land and has a lot of <br />flexibility. He felt that should be kept in mind when the Board <br />looks at his plans, and they should keep Sea Oaks separate. <br />Commissioner Eggert commented that with this Resolution <br />sitting here as it is written, she would have to vote against it <br />and she is not sure she is ready to do that. <br />Commissioner Bird pointed out that we could vote against the <br />Resolution and approve their landscape plan and let them go on <br />about their business, and then go ahead and form our rules and <br />everyone else will play by the rules we are subsequently going to <br />adopt. <br />Attorney Barkett stressed that all that would involve would <br />be to approve the site plan without that condition. He referred <br />to the drawing displayed earlier, which was prepared at the last <br />minute, and stressed that it is not exactly accurate because of <br />the perspective, which is from out in the river and not as if you <br />are standing on the road. The building is shown with its entire <br />frontage along the road, but actually you would only see a corner <br />of the building because the buildings are to be set at an angle <br />to the road. He agreed there are some areas of low level <br />plantings, but pointed out that they are all atop a 5' berm and <br />they are at least 2' plantings. <br />Commissioner Scurlock stated that when we develop the <br />guidelines, he would like to see more renderings so we can tell <br />better what the options are. <br />42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.