Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED CLOSING OF 134TH STREET IN <br />ROSELAND AND SCHEDULING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR SAME <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/8/89: <br />TO: James Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />FROM: James W. Davis, P.E. <br />Public Works Director <br />SUBJECT :Public Hearing for the Paving of 134th Street <br />in Roseland <br />DATE: March 8, 1989 <br />Description and Conditions <br />During the December 13, 1988 meeting of the Board of County <br />Commissioners, Staff was authorized to place the paving of 134th <br />Street from Roseland Road to the San Sebastian Catholic Church on <br />the County's Petition Paving program list and to schedule a public <br />hearing for the paving as the project moves up to the top of the <br />list. Staff currently has approximately twenty (20) projects on <br />the list, and the procedure has been to schedule public hearings <br />on a first come/first serve basis. <br />At the January 11, 1989 Transportation Planning Committee <br />Meeting, representatives from the church requested that the <br />paving of 134th Street be moved to the top of the list. The <br />Committee approved a motion "that this project be set for a <br />public hearing with all possible haste." <br />It is my understanding that the property owners along 134th <br />Street do not want the road open even if it were closed when the <br />church is not having services. Nor do they want the road paved. <br />Alternatives and Analysis <br />The alternatives are as follows: <br />Alternative No. 1 <br />Keep the project on the petition paving list it its present <br />position and schedule the public hearing in its proper <br />sequence. It may take staff eighteen (18) months to bring <br />the project to public hearing. <br />Alternative No. 2 <br />Move the project up to the top of the list and schedule a <br />public hearing in late April, 1989. <br />Recommendation <br />Staff is concerned that it would not be <br />petitioners to wait for their road to be <br />responds to more recent projects. Some <br />since 1986. Staff recommends Alternative <br />11 <br />Mh. AS 1 4 1989 <br />fair to require other <br />paved while the County <br />petitions have been in <br />No. 1. <br />BOOK 6 FPGi:359 <br />