Laserfiche WebLink
Davis said that is what he is hearing today; previously, he heard <br />that they didn't want it opened or paved. <br />Commissioner Scurlock recalled that back in December, the <br />Board's only question about limiting the use was that the road <br />was unpaved. In the original discussion, the Board said to put <br />the barricade there only because an unpaved road cannot bear that <br />amount of traffic. <br />Mr. Phillips advised that they would rather not have the <br />road paved than to have that traffic. <br />Chairman Wheeler broke into some heated debate on whether <br />the road should be paved, and emphasized that these questions <br />will be addressed at a public hearing. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion <br />was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />A parishioner, who did not give his name, didn't think it <br />was fair for the barricade to remain in place until such time <br />that a public hearing is held. <br />Mr. Dolan asked if there is a timeframe on the public <br />hearing, and Commissioner Eggert said that it would be 18 months <br />before the paving comes:up for a Public Hearing. <br />Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that we could schedule a <br />public hearing at anytime, and if the paving was approved, it <br />could go on the list in its normal order and everyone would know <br />where they stood. <br />Commissioner Bird didn't feel that we should schedule a <br />public hearing until we have a valid petition, or for that <br />matter, that the project should be on the paving list until then. <br />From what he is hearing from the residents today, it looks like <br />the residents will not submit a petition. He felt the question <br />of the barricade can be debated at some other meeting if the <br />Board decided to schedule it. <br />17 <br />MAR 1 4 1989 <br />BOOK305 <br />