3/21/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Commissioner Scurlock suggested a Motion of approval, but Commissioner Eggert had a question. She noted that when we were talking last time, it was her understanding that we were talking about, for instance, going out this year for Phase 1A and then another year continuing with the next and so on. She did not have the feeling that is what we are doing, but feels this is being set up without any chance of reviewing what is needed in the future. Chairman Wheeler asked if this has to be approved today or if it can be held over, and Administrator Chandler believed we could wait one more week. He noted that he had felt the essence of it had been discussed at the last meeting and this was put on the agenda because of some concern about the time element. Commissioner Eggert noted that the Board only received this proposal this morning, and she does not see where we are doing Phase to this year and other parts of it other years. Commissioner Scurlock agreed that he would like to see some dates associated with Phase 1A, etc. Utilities Director Pinto explained the reason they haven't put dates in is because it will be very difficult to say just when those specific tasks are going to be needed. He felt what staff is saying, particularly regarding the market analysis, is that we know it has to be done; it just is a matter of when it has to be done. We are not in a position to say let's wait for June, 1990, to do that. Commissioner Scurlock believed when you say phases, it is understood that you do one thing at a time, but that is really not explicit here, and he believed there should be some statement to indicate that these phases wili not be done all at the same time. He realized you cannot say January 3, 1991, but he agreed with Commissioner Eggert that it needed to be spelled out a little more clearly. Commissioner Eggert felt they had done some prioritizing. She believed she had heard that it was urgent that we get Phase 39 MAR 2`11 1989 mcq 76 PU 431