3/21/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

miAk_219 BOOK 76 FAH 432 1A done, and by the time that was done, then we would know a lot more about recycling than we did before. She agreed that phase needs to be done quickly, but she was not sure that all the rest of this needs to go out to a consultant. Commissioner Scurlock asked if we can get a critical path, and Director Pinto believed we can but asked why not approve this based on going phase by phase and when one phase is completed, staff will come back to the Board. Commissioner Scurlock felt if we could get a critical path and get a time frame to complete Phase 1; then staff could always come back to the Board based on that critical path to get the final okay to go to the next phase. Administrator Chandler knew we are getting very concerned about time because of the need to have the plan in by July 1st, but because of all the questions being raised on the time element, suggested that staff just resubmit it next week for final approval. Commissioner Eggert stressed that it was not just the time element; she just was not sure that this needs to go out of house on all of these phases. Administrator Chandler was concerned that people are oversimplifying what we need to get into and what that potential impact may be. He believed there is no doubt that the markets are going to dry up and that there will be a financial impact, and we need to be sure that when we approve this particular plan and submit it to the state that everyone is aware of the cost and if there is going to be any impact on the manner in which we collect in the unincorporated area. Commissioner Eggert emphasized that she did not disagree with any of that; she just did not feel the Board has been given what they asked for last week. Commissioner Scurlock suggested that we authorize staff's recommendation and make it clear that the Administrator has the ability to direct the phasing of the scope of work, and if he 40