My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/20/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
4/20/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:49:33 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:48:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/20/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Scurlock emphasized that we must set a very <br />definite policy in terms of committing capacity to anyone as we <br />do not want anyone claiming we are discriminating. <br />Director Pinto explained the sign off process, and pointed <br />out that the only time he and Hillman Goff sign off is for actual <br />construction of lines. This will only be for those who are ready <br />to build. <br />Discussion ensued about the unrealistic flow figures the DER <br />requires you to work with, and Commissioner Scurlock felt it is <br />because the DER is concerned about overdevelopment. <br />Commissioner Scurlock had one other thing he wanted to clear <br />up. He wanted to be sure there is no question about the County <br />charging impact fees since there have been some questions raised <br />about this in the past. He wished to go on record that the <br />County feels we can defend that impact fee, and he just wanted to <br />be sure that we aren't at odds with the City about this and that <br />this agreement doesn't address it in a negative way. <br />City Manager Little advised that the agreement just says <br />d <br />that this is the County's business, and it is the City's official <br />position that they are not going to get involved in that. The <br />County is not charging the City; they are charging individuals, <br />and he believed those individuals have all the rights they need <br />to protect their own interests. <br />EFFLUENT DISPOSAL <br />Mayor Macht asked that the County be made aware of some of <br />the City's discussion about effluent disposal. <br />City Manager Little advised that the City is pretty much <br />aware of what the County is doing regarding their planning in <br />this area. In regard to the wastewater effluent from the Vero <br />Beach plant, there has been a lot of social and environmental <br />pressure to take that out of the river. Several things are <br />happening around the state - they are getting very sticky as far <br />as toxicity tests, and they are getting particularly concerned on <br />11 <br />APR 2 0 1989 <br />POOK 76 F4,657 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.