5/16/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SAY 163 1989 LCOS 76 Fa:,E84 d Commissioner Eggert asked if this policy plan interfaces with the water districts to the south of us with respect to the Regional Planning Council, and Mr. Miller explained that there is an on-going basis of coordination with other water districts, and he felt their goals are the same. Commissioner Scurlock wondered about that since SJRWMD is buying land while the water districts to the south are building on their lands. Chairman Wheeler thanked Mr. Miller for coming this morning. PUBLIC DISCUSSION - C.N. KIRRIE'S PROBLEM IN COMPLETING SITE PLAN IN ROSE -4 DISTRICT The Board reviewed the following memo dated 5/10/89: Tong Board of County CommissionersDATE: May 10, 1989 SUBJECT: FROWN .. James E. Chandler REFERENCES: County Administrator FILE: During the month of February I had several discussions and meetings with Mr. C. N. Kirrie concerning his site plan that was approved by the Commission on May 17, 1988. In the process I thoroughly reviewed the factors relating to the site plan and questions raised by Mr. Kirrie. As a result, those questions were satisfactorily resolved, with the exception, evidently, of the question relating to the number of employees authorized. As you are aware the site plan was processed and approved under the provisions of the old Rose -4 district (Ord. 87-22), which had been repealed. One of the Rose -4 provisions was that the number of employees was limited to on-site family members. However, in the course of the May 17th deliberations it appeared the Commission was willing to extend that number to off-site persons employed at the time by grandfathering them in. That determination was transmitted to Mr. Kirrie by letter dated June 9, 1988 from the Current Development Staff Planner, County Attorney and former County Administrator. 14