5/16/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

During my meetings with Mr. Kirrie he indicated that he could not give or document one specific number of offsite employees. He advised that was because due to the nature of his business the number varied during the course of the year. In an effort to equitably resolve the matter from Mr. Kirrie's standpoint and consistent with what in my opinion appeared to be the Commission's intent, I indicated that I would approve a total of nine (9) employees. This was predicated on family members and the number of off-site employees his type facility would normally accommodate. Considering the total circumstances surrounding this particular site plan, I felt a total number must be established. My decision was related to Mr. Kirrie at our February 28, 1989 meeting and in response to his request confirmed by letter dated March 30, 1989. Although not related to the employee issue, due to the timing, two additional questions may need to be addressed and resolved. At the time of my meetings with Mr. Kirrie he had applied for a building permit and was subject to 1988 traffic impact fee rates. That time element has since lapsed and the 1989 rates are applicable. Additionally, since the site plan was approved on May 17, 1988, the approval normally would expire May 17, 1989, unless extended by the Commission. Administrator Chandler noted that there are 3 issues to be considered this morning: 1) Total number of employees allowed 2) Traffic impact fee rates 3) Extension of site plan for expansion that was approved 5/17/88 Commissioner Scurlock asked how many employees had been requested, and Administrator Chandler explained that he was unable to get a specific number from Mr. Kirrie because Mr. Kirrie indicated that he was not able to demonstrate what the numbers were at any given time due to the nature of his business. At one point, Mr. Kirrie threw out the figure of 20, but later on they discussed 12-15 employees. Commissioner Scurlock asked if we had verified the maximum number of employees at any one time and whether staff had checked directly with FICA records, and Administrator Chandler emphasized that we have never received any documentation on the number of employees. Chairman Wheeler asked if Ordinance 87-22 specifically points out the number of employees allowed, and Administrator Chandler stated that Ordinance 87-22 does not specify the number of employees, but does state that employees would be on-site family members. However, the Minutes of the meeting at which MAY 1 1989 15 co °lb F' ,F 84