My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/16/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
5/16/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:51:48 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:50:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/16/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAY 16 1989 <br />fools <br />eff <br />employees you have under the current conditions, family members <br />and others, that are working there and we will grandfather them <br />in. We don't want you there in the first place, and in the long <br />run and at some point in time, maybe 20 years from now, we want <br />this grandfathering situation to come into compliance. That is <br />what you do when you rezone; you hope that at some point <br />everything comes into compliance. <br />Attorney O'Haire stated he would agree with everything <br />Commissioner Scurlock has said were it not for the fact that <br />ROSE -4 Ordinance 87-22 contemplated the expansion of the use in <br />the terms provided for site plan approval. We were not freezing <br />everything in place, and it was, indeed, the intention that the <br />use could be expanded under the circumstances set forth in this <br />ordinance. <br />Commissioner Eggert pointed out that it says "within the <br />framework of the family doing it", and Commissioner Scurlock felt <br />that expanded or increased warehouse area would imply that there <br />would be no additional employees. <br />Attorney O'Haire interjected that it could be for general <br />contract, for example, and depends on the use involved. <br />Commissioner Scurlock didn't feel that it could track back <br />to more employees, but Attorney O'Haire maintained that it very <br />well could. <br />Chairman Wheeler remembered the conversation where Mr. <br />Kirrie said that he needed the additional space for the work he <br />was doing; that he had to move some equipment or reuse it; and <br />that it just wasn't well organized and he needed additional <br />space. <br />Commissioner Eggert remembered that Mr. Kirrie had said that <br />most of his stuff was outside and exposed, and needed to be <br />warehoused. <br />C. N. Kirrie, 12855 79th Avenue, Roseland, wished to direct <br />the Commission's attention to Page 2 of the packet of material he <br />had given to each Commissioner at the beginning of today's <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.