Laserfiche WebLink
AN 6 1989 <br />BOOK 76 Fr1GLIO02. <br />ARCHERY CLUB LICENSE AGREEMENT - COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 5/31/89: <br />To: James Chandler, <br />County Administra r <br />From: Jack Price, P son en 1 <br />Date: May 31, 1989 <br />Sub: Archery Club <br />Agreement <br />As you know, the Board of County Commissioners approved a License <br />Agreement with Indian River Archers, Inc., and authorized the <br />Chairman to sign it subject to receipt of appropriate insurance <br />certificates and an approved safety plan. <br />The safety plan has been completed but several of the insurance <br />requirements have not been met. Some areas in which we may <br />soften the requirements have been discussed with the club <br />president and sent to our Legal Department for review (attached <br />May 24, 1989 memo). <br />If any of the requirements are changed, then the License <br />Agreement previously approved by the Board of County <br />Commissioners must be changed since they are a part of the <br />Agreement. <br />Administrator Chandler advised that the Archery Club has <br />obtained insurance through their national organization, and that <br />insurer provides insurance coverage to each of the local archery <br />clubs that qualify. However, the form in which that insurance is <br />provided is different than what we had specified in our <br />agreement. In our review of their insurance, we feel we are <br />protected and don't see a real problem with it. In addition, <br />they have passed a safety inspection. In the meantime we also <br />have talked to Gallagher -Bassett, who handles the County's claims <br />in excess of $100,000, and they have indicated that they have no <br />real problem with modifying this. There are several changes that <br />need to be made within our agreement, but we feel comfortable <br />with it. <br />Commissioner Bird understood then that the Administrator is <br />recommending that we go ahead with the modifications outlined by <br />Personnel Director Jack Price rather than the version outlined in <br />the memo from Assistant County Attorney Sharon Brennan. <br />Administrator Chandler felt the only differences between the <br />two versions were in the language concerning notification of <br />56 <br />