My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/06/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
06/06/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:15:12 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:52:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/06/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUN 61989 <br />BOOK 76 FAG 035 <br />proceed any further on this, and that is why this is on the <br />Agenda today. <br />Commissioner Scurlock understood then that the Motion would <br />be to authorize permission to cooperate with the First Baptist <br />Church in condemning the land to be swapped, and then have it <br />come back to the Board for final approval. <br />Attorney Vitunac said that was correct. The first thing <br />would be a contract with the church with contingencies, and the <br />second would be the adoption of a resolution authorizing <br />condemnation of that property. In the meantime, we would be <br />talking with the land owner to assure that he was happy with that <br />procedure. <br />Commissioner Scurlock was just looking for a Motion that <br />lets us move ahead, but would satisfy Commissioner Bird's concern <br />in that it provides us with an ability to say that we are going <br />to move somewhere else. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously authorized <br />staff to begin the process as long as that doesn't <br />inhibit our ability to withdraw. <br />Commissioner Bird stated that he still preferred to wait for <br />the master plan, but didn't mind our going through the process <br />and developing the facts. He probably would vote against it when <br />it comes back though. <br />Commissioner Eggert emphasized that the courthouse has to be <br />built somewhere in Vero Beach as it is the county seat. <br />89 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.