6/13/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JUN 1 S 1989 BOOK 17 F�nE 32 Boulevard, but since there was a median cut already, it was felt this could be allowed. Commissioner Scurlock asked this maintenance facility couldn't be combined where the present facility is located, and Mr. Fielder explained that where it is now is the River Club property and there is separate ownership of that club. In the central location proposed, the consolidated facility would be under joint ownership. Commissioner Bowman asked about the zoning north of the proposed facility, and Planner Boling advised that it is multi -family with some commercial in the vicinity. Commissioner Scurlock still felt that with 800 acres, they would have the ability to work out internal access somehow, and Chairman Wheeler agreed that the purpose of the Boulevard is to move traffic not to open up development. Considerable discussion ensued as to the intersection that would be needed for the multi -family development, where the main entrance would be, etc., and Planning Director Keating believed some of the median cuts and access points were negotiated when the property acquisition was going on for the Boulevard, and the only reason they considered allowing access at this point was because the median cut and the curb cut were already programmed. Bill Nelson, interested citizen, felt Grand Harbor should be asked if they have an alternate spot if this is denied. He agreed we want to keep the Boulevard beautiful and flowing. The Chairman determined that no one further wished to be heard and thereupon closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously denied the request for a Development Order amendment and PRD Special Exception Approval for a golf maintenance site and facility addition to the Grand Harbor project. 32