6/27/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JUN ! 1999 RooK 77 Commissioner Bird asked if this would pertain to the present alignment or to the proposed realignment, and Mr. McQueen believed it pertains to the proposed realignment and to the present alignment. He wished to make a further presentation to clear up the figures staff has presented regarding the buffer, setbacks, etc., and also pointed out that there is 40' on each side because of the conservation easement they are dedicating to the County. Commissioner Eggert noted that, in other words, there would be a total of 80' through there as opposed to 501, and Mr. McQueen agreed they basically would give the County an 80' R/W. Attorney Doty believed we may be comparing apples to oranges. If the developer is indeed willing to convey in fee simple to the County 25' on the center line on the present alignment as exists today, that will solve the research problem only for the confines of the Town of Orchid, but it does not affect the R/W not within the Town of Orchid. Commissioner Bird believed we will have to do the research for the remainder of the Trail. Chairman Wheeler recessed the meeting for 10 minutes so that staff could clarify.the figures under discussion, and the meeting reconvened ten minutes later with the same members present. The Chairman asked staff to make their presentation before we move into the public hearing. Question arose from the audience as to why the Board was moving ahead now when they had been discussing tabling, and the Chairman explained that we are moving ahead because no one offered a Motion to table. The Chairman further pointed out that when the Board was talking about tabling, there was a question about the 50' R/W, but it now appears we may acquire the 50' R/W without the necessity of doing all the research. He asked staff 28