Laserfiche WebLink
- M M <br />to clarify the figures discussed earlier and proceed with their <br />presentation. <br />Chief Planner Boling referred to the following graphic: <br />til -tit Rol R/W <br />°firMTERLONE <br />SErBAetc. �u FFR t3/W <br />jo AO' <br />w fTO VA5' R . <br />Ce:N1ER �hJE <br />SEiBA�K u PFR RjW <br />Sol 1 S' o? 5 <br />,r- 8u PFER <br />'�-/40,SOFFEI d1raw <br />Planner Boling explained that what we have now is a 20' <br />roadbed. If what the applicant is proposing with the realignment <br />is approved, it would establish a 20' R/W from the centerline, a <br />20' buffer beyond that, and a 30' setback. When you compare that <br />to the road R/W now if the realignment did not go through, the <br />buffers were not established, and no more rights of the County <br />were enforced, clearing could take place up to the road itself. <br />With the 25' R/W from the centerline, you would have a 15' buffer <br />and a 30' setback. In other words, if the County has a 50' R/W <br />total, any setback would start from that R/W. With what the <br />developer has proposed, you would have basically an 80' area of <br />R/W and buffer before the setback would start. <br />Chief Planner Boling made the staff presentation, as <br />follows, noting that some of the conditions have been tightened <br />up slightly since being approved by the P&Z Commission: <br />29 Bou 77 F' <br />�.JUN1 ��nn ,4i. -;F 187 <br />