My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/27/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
6/27/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:01:02 PM
Creation date
6/15/2015 4:38:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/27/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUN 27 '289 booK 77 <br />could change the existing historically rural character of the <br />Trail. <br />The design of the proposed new Trail/project entrance road <br />intersection would include the decision as to whether or not <br />stop signs should be placed to stop traffic on the Trail or <br />the project entrance road. In the opinion of the Public <br />Works Director, the best traffic practice would be to have <br />Trail traffic stop since traffic on a less travelled unpaved <br />road should normally yield to a more travelled paved road. <br />The Indian River County Historical Society has expressed its <br />opinion that if the realignment proposal is approved, Jungle <br />Trail traffic should not have to yield to project traffic <br />since Trail continuity is an objective in the Management <br />Plan. <br />C. Surrounding development: <br />According to Bill Thurston of the Division of Historical <br />Resources, development of an area can change the character <br />and surroundings along the Trail and consequently "degrade" <br />the historic character and value of the road. The realign- <br />ment plan proposes preservation of a mature hammock along a <br />significant portion of the proposed new Trail segment. <br />Further buffering proposals (native vegetation and existing <br />citrus trees) establish some "knowns" regarding the future <br />character of the proposed Trail segment: that the citrus and <br />buffer areas and the conservation tract will maintain a rural <br />and natural character. The area along the proposed new Trail <br />segment would be more rural and natural in appearance than <br />the existing segment if golf course and residential areas are <br />developed around the existing Trail. <br />D. Relation and jurisdiction: <br />The subject Trail area is a concern to both the County and <br />the Town of Orchid. The proposal, with conditions, could <br />essentially give coordinated and joint "control" of this area <br />of the Trail to the County and the Town. The conservation <br />and buffer areas 'and conservation tract could be granted to <br />both the County and the Town to ensure a perpetual and <br />coordinated effort to maintain the Trail properly. <br />Alternatives: <br />There are essentially two viable alternatives for the County: <br />denial or approval with conditions. (The applicant has repeatedly <br />expressed concerns for timing and desires action on the request.] <br />If the County denies the realignment request, the developer could <br />either build/re-design around and over the Trail in accordance <br />with adopted Town of Orchid regulations or he could partially <br />develop now and re-initiate a different proposal at a later date; <br />the overall effect of the development on the Trail would be <br />unknown. If the County approves the realignment request with <br />conditions, the developer would proceed with the basic design <br />indicated on the submitted realignment plans; the parameters of <br />the overall effect of the development on the Trail would be <br />known. <br />CONCLUSION: <br />As shown in the report's analysis section, the proposed realign- <br />ment would enhance the scenic value of the Trail and can, with <br />conditions, clearly meet all of the realignment review criteria <br />specified in the Jungle Trail Management Plan with the exception <br />of the criterion regarding historical character and integrity; <br />evaluating historical impacts is not as clear-cut an issue as the <br />other criteria. In staff's opinion, the historic rural character, <br />and environment surrounding the existing Trail will be eventually <br />diminished by impending development over which the County has <br />little or no control. If the proposal is denied and the project <br />38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.