My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/27/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
6/27/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:01:02 PM
Creation date
6/15/2015 4:38:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/27/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
pursuing letters of no objection; although, staff has changed <br />their recommendation about that to have them conform to Director <br />Davis' recommendation about their realignment. He then referred <br />to a letter received from the Uniola Chapter of the Florida <br />Native Plant Society, which he believed endorses the new align- <br />ment, and he also felt a letter from the Historical Properties <br />Associates, which talks about a "no-win" situation, is somewhat <br />an endorsement for the realignment. Mr. McQueen personally felt <br />that both sides win with what they have proposed. As to the <br />importance and value attached to having Jungle Trail put on the <br />National Register, he felt the Commission must consider whether <br />what they are doing is to the benefit and best interests of the <br />public, and noted that the value of the real estate they are <br />proposing to put in the county's hands is about 1.7 million. He <br />further pointed out that the letter from the State of Florida <br />about the National Register states that the owners of the site <br />being proposed for nomination are notified in writing and given <br />an opportunity to comment on the proposal, but they were not <br />notified nor given an opportunity to comment. It also states <br />that if the owners object, the site will not be listed. Mr. <br />McQueen believed it could benefit the developer for this to be on <br />the National Register as it would give them some tax advantages, <br />and if the Historical Society wishes, they would pursue this <br />being on the Register subject, of course, to the realignment and <br />abandonment. <br />Mr. McQueen wrapped up his presentation by addressing the <br />following conditions in staff's recommendation. <br />3.) In regard to the applicant granting property lying east of <br />the realigned portion except 200' at the entrance, they would <br />like to change that to dedicate all that portion south of their <br />entrance except the first 5001. That would give the developer <br />control of his entrance. <br />4.) Re the 30' building setback being a buffer area, they have <br />agreed to establish the first 10' of that as a conservation <br />57 <br />-- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.