My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/27/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
6/27/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:01:02 PM
Creation date
6/15/2015 4:38:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/27/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 77 f'tq,GE <br />easement and their building setback could go from that 101, but <br />to restrict what they would do in that other 20' is a tough <br />restriction, and they would ask that the Board strike Condition <br />#4 or add that 10' of that habitable building setback instead be <br />established and granted to the County, not the full 30'. <br />6.) They would ask that the County not restrict buildings being <br />placed on the previous alignment of Jungle Trail, which would <br />affect the one building lot. <br />The Board recessed at Noon for five minutes and then <br />reconvened with the same members present. <br />Attorney Kevin Doty came before the Board representing the <br />County Historical Society. He contended that the abandonment and <br />realignment are separate and distinct items and that there should <br />be no talk of abandonment at this time; advised that they intend <br />to offer evidence that will suggest that any realignment will <br />adversely affect the historical integrity of the Trail; contended <br />that the procedure followed to date is wrong because they feel a <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment is a required step; and advised that <br />there is some evidence this may be a state highway and the County <br />may not have the right to abandon it. Attorney Doty stressed <br />that the Society's ultimate position is that they are opposed and <br />feel this application should be denied and stated that he would <br />at this time renew their request that this item be tabled until <br />the questions he has brought up can be answered. <br />THERE WAS NO MOTION TO TABLE. <br />Attorney Doty began his presentation contending that the <br />applicant's stated reason for the application "to provide <br />necessary security for development and to buffer the Trail from <br />development" is not criteria on which a realignment request can <br />be based. The developer bought this property subject to the <br />58 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.