My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/27/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
6/27/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:01:02 PM
Creation date
6/15/2015 4:38:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/27/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r � � <br />Chairman Wheeler asked if anyone else wished to be heard. <br />There were none, and he thereupon closed the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Scurlock had some technical questions. He <br />wished to know the distance between the existing Trail and the <br />proposed realignment on the north, and Planner Boling felt it is <br />probably about 120' to the north of the existing road. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if anyone on our staff has <br />figured out the total acreage of the road as proposed versus what <br />the existing alignment is, and Mr. McQueen advised that they are <br />giving the County 17 acres over and above the amount they are <br />asking be abandoned. <br />Commissioner Scurlock questioned the safety of having their <br />intersection in the center of a curve, and Mr. McQueen explained <br />that will be a smooth curve linear alignment with a greater radii <br />than existing and they have talked with staff about making it <br />curve even more gently. <br />Commissioner Scurlock then asked why they don't go back <br />closer to the existing alignment on the north so they can stay <br />further away from the Polo Club property. <br />Mr. McQueen believed they probably can get back very close <br />to the existing alignment on about 900' of the 1320' segment. <br />Commissioner Bird discussed our various options, and be- <br />lieved what it all comes down to is how we roll the dice and what <br />we are willing to gamble with today or in the future. <br />Discussion ensued at length as to what.could happen with the <br />proposed buffer, etc., along the length of the Polo Club <br />property. <br />Mr. McQueen pointed out that the Polo Club has a conceptual <br />PRD in effect right now. He believed in that PRD the County has <br />made provisions for 50' from the centerline of Jungle Trail, and, <br />of course, in a PRD, you have a 25' setback along your borders; <br />so, he believed the County has pretty good protection in place <br />with.the Polo development already. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.